Сравнительный анализ традиционного обучения письму и обучения письму на основе аутентичных материалов

Authors

Keywords: traditional, real, material-based writing instruction, comparison, approaches, authentic materials, hybrid model, advantages, problems

Abstract

This article examines the comparative advantages, problems, and consequences of these two approaches, which will allow teachers seeking to improve their pedagogical practice to gain an understanding of them.

References

1. Ahmed M. Authentic Materials in Language Learning: The Role of Real-World Context in Language Acquisition. // Journal of Language Teaching and Research 11 (3), 2020.

2. Belcher D.D., & Braine, G. Academic writing in a second language: A study of the writing practices of ESL students. Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 1995, -P. 220-248.

3. Gilmore A. Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 40(2), 2007.

4. Graham S., & Perin D. Evidence-based practices in writing instruction: A meta-analysis. Writing Research, 2(4), 2007, -Р.191-235.

5. Harmer J. How to teach writing. Pearson Education, 2004.

6. Hyland K. Second language writing. – Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

7. Lee M. The Effectiveness of Traditional Writing Exercises vs. Real-World Tasks: A Comparative Study. // Education and Training in a Digital Age, vol. 29, №. 3, -Р. 55-77, 2022.

8. Peacock M. The Evaluation of Materials for Language Learning: A Critical Review of the Research. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 1997, 35(4).