ZAMONAVIY TA’LIM KONSEPSIYALARI VA METODOLOGIK YONDAShUVLARDAN TA’LIMIY MAQSADLARDA FOYDALANISh

Authors

Keywords: distance learning, artificial intelligence, cognitive-behavioral, individualized learning, social constructivist, connectivist pedagogy, connectivism, connectivist learning

Abstract

This article identifies and analyzes three generations of distance education pedagogy. Unlike earlier classifications of distance education based on the technologies used, this analysis focuses on the pedagogical approaches that define the learning experiences embedded in instructional design. Although this classification of pedagogical approaches can also be applied to traditional (face-to-face) education, the requirement for openness and clarity in both the content and processes of distance education makes this study particularly relevant for distance education designers, instructors, and developers.

References

1. Anderson T., Dron J. Three generations of distance education pedagogy. // IRRODL, 12(3), 2011. – P. 80-97.

2. Garrison D.R. Implications of online and blended learning for the conceptual development and practice of distance education. // The Journal of Distance Education, 23(2). Retrieved from. 2009. – P. 24.

3. Anderson T. The dance of technology and pedagogy in self-paced distance education. Paper presented at the 17th ICDE World Congress, Maastricht. Retrieved from. 2009. – P. 58.

4. Holmberg B. Theory and practice of distance education. – London: UK: Routledge, 1989.

5. McKerlich R., Anderson T. Community of inquiry and learning in immersive environments. // Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 11(4). 2007.